Skip Navigation

Screen 2005 46(1):15-31; doi:10.1093/screen/hjh044
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moor, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© John Logie Baird Centre 2005. All rights reserved

Autobiography, the self and Pressburger–Powell's The Golden Years project

Andrew Moor

Lectures in Film and English Literature at the University of Wales Bangor. He is author of Powell and Pressburger: a Cinema of Magic Spaces (IB Tauris, 2005) and coeditor (with Graeme Harper) of Signs of Life: Medicine and Cinema (Wallflower, 2005). He researches British Cinema and gay/queer culture and has also published on Derek Jarman, Anton Walbrook, Neil Jordan and Hein Heckroth

In 1952 Emeric Pressburger completed The Golden Years, an ‘autobiographical’ screenplay about Richard Strauss, a formally inventive work written as if the camera were the composer, with the entire film envisaged as a series of point-of-view shots. In the final sequence, genuine home-movie footage of Strauss's 85th birthday celebrations was to be screened within the frame-narrative, finally providing images of the narrator-subject. The film was never produced, but the screenplay shows Powell and Pressburger's ongoing interest in life-writing and in the links between subjectivity and intertextuality. Like literary autobiographies, it demonstrates the impossibility of its ideal aim to encapsulate the truth about its subject. This essay considers the screenplays narrative structure, and its treatment of ballet and opera. Pressburger's idealistic claim that the screenplay allows us to ‘know’ the composer is analysed in the light of modernist concerns about life-writing, truth and knowledge, with comparisons made to Blimp and The Red Shoes. The autobiographical subject is endlessly elusive, inevitably objectified, and the meaning of the ‘contained’ home-movie footage critiques the project's overt aim to ‘present’ him. After arguing that the piece constructs an inter-subjective self, defined through relations with others, the essay relates Pressburger's masqueraded autobiography to his experience of traumatic exile, and links this to Powell's own quasi-fictional autobiography, A Life in Movies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.