Skip Navigation

Screen 2005 46(2):155-173; doi:10.1093/screen/hjh057
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The John Logie Baird Centre. All rights reserved

Articles

‘It's a woman!’: the question of gender on Who Wants to be a Millionaire

Su Holmes

Lecturer in Film and Television at the University of Kent. Her key research interests are in the early relations between British television and film culture, celebrity, reality TV, and popular television more generally. She is author of British Television and Film Culture in the 1950s: Coming to a TV Near You! (Intellect, 2005), and coeditor of Understanding Reality Television (Routledge, 2004)

This article examines the construction of gender on the UK version of Who Wants to be a Millionaire – where women have arguably been notable by their absence. The dearth of female contestants on a show regarded as the most successful quiz format of all time – and the impact of this on its construction of gender – raises some serious issues for feminist analysis, particularly when it has had very little to say about the sexual politics of the quiz show at all. ‘It's a woman!’ is the exclamation offered by host Chris Tarrant when a woman does make it into the chair, a phrase which marks women as spectacle, different, special, but above all, other in the arena of Millionaire. The exclamation is intended to function simply as a statement of fact, but my interest here is in the discursive concept of ‘woman’ that the programme brings into being. Here, I consider how gender is mediated in Millionaire through its discursive construction of family, production and consumption. The article ultimately suggests that the programme's highly dichotomised construction of gender roles function to play down what (for the quiz show) may be the potentially more divisive boundaries of class.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Television New MediaHome page
J. Franco
Extreme Makeover: The Politics of Gender, Class, and Cultural Identity
Television New Media, November 1, 2008; 9(6): 471 - 486.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
S. Holmes
'The Question Is - Is It All Worth Knowing?' The cultural circulation of the early British quiz show
Media Culture Society, January 1, 2007; 29(1): 53 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Cultural StudiesHome page
S. Holmes
Not the Final Answer: Critical Approaches to the Quiz Show and Who Wants to Be a Millionaire
European Journal of Cultural Studies, November 1, 2005; 8(4): 483 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.