Skip Navigation

Screen 2005 46(2):213-216; doi:10.1093/screen/hjh060
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petrie, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The John Logie Baird Centre. All rights reserved

Dossier

Scottish cinema: introduction

Duncan Petrie

Professor of Film at the University of Auckland. His books include Contemporary Scottish Fictions (Edinburgh University Press, 2004), Screening Scotland (BFI, 2000), The British Cinematographer (BFI, 1996) and Creativity and Constraint in the British Film Industry (Macmillan, 1991)

The enhanced profile of Scottish film over the last decade has provided a greater impetus for scholarly engagement in a field dominated until recently by Colin McArthur's radical critique of the cinematic representations of Scotland as defined in relation to the monolithic and regressive discourses of Tartanry, Kailyard.and Clydesideism. An alternative line of analysis has subsequently emerged in the work of cultural critics such as Cairns Craig and Angus Calder who mobilize respectively the Bakhtininan concepts of heteroglossia and the Carnival to posit a richer and more positive conceptualisation of tradition, myth and practice in the making and remaking of Scottish cultural identity. This line of thinking also informs Duncan Petrie's reassessment of the historical legacy of cinematic representations of Scotland and his identification of a vibrant New Scottish cinema that emerged in 1980s and 1990s. This dossier, featuring analyses of recent Scottish films by new critics, extends the debate: Jonny Murray foregrounds the American influence on Scottish cinema and culture; David Martin-Jones considers the ways in which devolutionary Scotland has functioned in relation to a damaged English identity; Ian Goode focuses on questions of interiority, gender and memory; and Sarah Neely considers a distinctive Scottish contribution to the ‘heritage’ genre.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.