Skip Navigation

Screen 2005 46(3):315-328; doi:10.1093/screen/hjh073
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eleftheriotis, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Screen. All rights reserved

Early cinema as child: historical metaphor and European cinephilia in Lumière & Company

Dimitris Eleftheriotis

Senior Lecturer in Film and Television Studies at the University of Glasgow. He is editor of Asian Cinemas: a Reader and Guide (Edinburgh University Press, forthcoming 2006) and author of the monograph Popular Cinemas of Europe: Studies of Texts, Contexts and Frameworks (Continuum, 2002). He sits on the advisory boards of Screen and Portal

The essay discusses some of the discursive peculiarities of the use of childhood as historical metaphor employed regularly in conceptualizations of the early period of cinema. The film Lumière & Company provides the frame of reference of the essay. Made in 1995 the film consists of forty short pieces directed by well-known directors from around the world and shot with a restored cinematograph. The essay identifies a child–adult relation as structuring the historical perspective of the film. Textual analysis reveals profound ambivalence in the project of the film, which was part of European commemorations of the 100th anniversary of the ‘birth’ of cinema. The celebration of early cinema, that is the declared objective of the film, goes hand-in-hand with an implicit critique of the naivete of a cinema of display and attractions, echoing in this way European attitudes to childhood. Furthermore, the majority of the handful of non-European directors participating, seem to challenge the position of ‘fathers of cinema’ attributed to the Lumière brothers by asserting their difference and implicitly foregrounding their exclusion from a late nineteenth-century, white, middle-class and European cultural form. The essay concludes by examining these ambivalences in the light of specifically European anxieties about the nature of cinema in the 1990s.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.