Skip Navigation

Screen 2006 47(3):327-345; doi:10.1093/screen/hjl025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Screen. All rights reserved

Performing memory on television: documentary and the 1960s

Myra Macdonald

This article examines the performance of memory within British television documentaries that explore the 1960s. Taking ‘cultural memory’ as its theoretical frame, it investigates how the meaning of the sixties is negotiated in the interplay between witness memories, voice-over commentary and archive footage. The specificities of televisual codes and conventions in animating or constraining ‘memory work’ are examined through an analysis of various aspects of memory performance, including narrational style, bodily expressiveness, and physical location. These differing ways of performing memory are shown to struggle for authority against voice-over commentary and archive footage. Commentary, in addition to subordinating witness testimony, constructs an artificial distinction between forms of rebelliousness that were often interrelated in practice. The three categories of archive footage - film of music festivals and protest demonstrations, and excerpts from 1960s' television or films - are demonstrated to exist in varying relations to individual memories. While music festival footage is largely detached from witness recollections, memories of protest demonstrations act principally as commentary on the archive film. Only the interleaving of individual memories and archive excerpts from television or fiction film grants more authority to the voices of witnesses, but even here memory work, as a process, remains bounded.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.