Skip Navigation

Screen 2006 47(3):347-365; doi:10.1093/screen/hjl026
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jess-Cooke, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Screen. All rights reserved

Virtualizing the Real: sequelization and secondary memory in Steven Spielberg's Artificial Intelligence: A. I.

Carolyn Jess-Cooke

This essay employs Steven Spielberg's Artificial Intelligence: A. I. to explore concepts of repetition and memory in post-millennial cinema in terms of Jacques Lacan's discussions of the Real. As a technological sequel of a deceased boy, the film's protagonist, an android child named David (Haley Joel Osment), arguably signals a prominent trend in contemporary cinema – sequelization – and is discussed here in the light of Spielberg's representations of memorialization according to the processes of secondary memory. By carefully examining the film's latent investments in psychic discourses, I explore Spielberg's presentation of a virtual subconscious and, accordingly, the depiction of David's psychological maturity from a machine to a ‘Real’ boy. The film's cinematography alerts us to this maturity, at the same time as it suggests David's virtual subconscious as both rooted in infantile desire and reflective of modes of memorialization and spectatorship in contemporary culture. I go on to examine the film's preoccupation with repetitions and re-enactments of the Holocaust, insofar as David as his kind are subjected to torture and extinction because they are not ‘real’. ‘History’, as one of the robots states, ‘repeats itself’. Focusing on the dilemma within the film to represent history, the essay ties together notions of sequelization and secondary memory by considering both as processes of recycled and culturally produced iterations of the past.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.